WebCommonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1 (‘Tasmanian Dams case’) Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Queensland Rail (2015) 89 ALJR 434 (‘Queensland Rail case’) Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Commonwealth v Tasmania (popularly known as the Tasmanian Dam Case) was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on 1 July 1983. The case was a landmark decision in Australian constitutional law, and was a significant moment in the history of conservation in Australia. The … See more In 1978, the Hydro-Electric Commission, then a body owned by the Tasmanian government, proposed the construction of a hydro-electric dam on the Gordon River, below its confluence with the Franklin River, in … See more The case revolved around several major constitutional issues, the most important being the constitutional validity of the World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 (or World Heritage Act). The division of powers between the Australian federal government … See more The case was later referred to in other cases regarding the definition of Aboriginality (Aboriginal Australian identity). Commonwealth v Tasmania had defined an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander as "a person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent … See more • Commonwealth v Tasmania – Full text of the decision in the High Court of Australia. • Australian Constitution – Full text. • World Heritage Properties Conservation Act, 1983 (Cth) See more A four to three majority of the seven members of the High Court held that the federal government had legitimately prevented … See more The case ended the HEC's plans to construct more hydro-electric dams in Tasmania. The legal debate over the extent of the "external affairs" … See more • Australian constitutional law • Franklin Dam controversy • 1981 Tasmanian power referendum See more
Commonwealth v Tasmania Wiki - everipedia.org
Web>> 31 May 1983 The issue is brought before the High Court, Commonwealth v Tasmania. The government of Tasmania claims that as the right to legislate for the environment was not named in the Constitution, and was thus a residual power held by the states, that the World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 was unconstitutional. WebCommonwealth v Tasmania [1] was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on 1 July 1983. The case was a landmark decision in Australian constitutional law, and was a significant moment in the history of conservation in Australia. The case centred on the proposed construction of a hydro-electric dam on the Gordon … optus mobile plans with phone
Commonwealth v Tasmania Case Summary - Studocu
WebCommonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1 in which the High Court said that the Parliament had the constitutional power to implement the Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage to ensure the protection of certain areas of Tasmanian wilderness. 38. Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501. WebJun 19, 2024 · Tasmanian Dams or Franklin Dams case (Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) FACTS: The Tasmanian Gov intended to dam the Franklin River to create a source of hydroelectricity, something that was … portsmouth bookfest 2023