WebRoyston E. Potter (plaintiff) was terminated from his employment as a police officer in Murray City, Utah (defendant). Potter was terminated for violating Article III of the Utah … Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333 (1890) — upheld ban on voting and holding political office in the Idaho Territory for all members of organizations that teach or advocate polygamy; Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States, 136 U.S. 1 (1890) and 140 U.S. 665 (1891) 20th … See more Polygamy is the state of being married to more than one person at the same time. It is illegal in many countries. The following is a list of polygamy court cases: See more • Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada, 2011 BCSC 1588 — court opinion that prohibition of polygamy is constitutionally valid. See more • Hyde v. Hyde (1866) {L.R.} 1 P. & D. 130 — established the modern understanding and legal definition of marriage • Bethell v. Hillyard (1885) 38 Ch.D. 220. [1885 B. 2119.] — a … See more • Legal status of polygamy • Short Creek raid • YFZ Ranch § April 2008 raid See more • Montcho case (July 11, 1980, n°16596) — Allowed family reunification for polygamous households. See more 19th century • Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878) • Miles v. United States, 103 U.S. 304 (1880) — … See more
Potter v. Murray City, 474 US 849 - Supreme Court 1985
Web21 May 2013 · And we truly paean your decision to attempt to make a buck from this losing battle with the laws of the State of Utah by writing apparently not one but two books about yourself : your 1986 book, An Offender For a Word: The Polygamy Case of Royston Potter vs. Murray City, et. Al, and your 1996 book, I Wed Three Wives. WebPotter v. Murray City: Lack of Prosecution does not establish an Abandonment of State Laws and an Irrational Revival of Moribund Laws..... 17 2. State v. Green: The Utah Supreme Court Finds Utah’s Bigamy Statute Neutral, Both Facially and As … nafta cleaning solvent
More on “LTC” Royston Potter and polygamy - This ain
Web10 Apr 2024 · Potter v. Murray City, 760 F.2d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 1985) (in light of "fundamental values, the State is justified, by a compelling interest, in upholding and enforcing its ban on plural marriage to protect the … WebSee, e.g., Potter v. Murray City, 760 F.2d 1065 (10th Cir. 1985); Bronson v. Swenson, 394 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (D. Utah 2005); State v. Holm, 137 P.3d 726 (Utah 2006). 7. United States v. … Web37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1652, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,222 Royston E. Potter v. Murray City, a Municipal Corporation, Calvin G. Gillen, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police … medieval education pdf